
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disclosure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.irishstu.com/stublog/2008/08/15/disclosure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.irishstu.com/stublog/2008/08/15/disclosure/</link>
	<description>being the discourse of Mr. Stewart Curry Esq, husband, gentlemen, blogger, and designer of slight renown. Herewithin lie dispatches and discourses from my mind and the world of the cybersphere. I pray you, gentle reader, to enjoy my vain meanderings, and should the fancy take you, to comment upon my follies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:04:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bren</title>
		<link>http://www.irishstu.com/stublog/2008/08/15/disclosure/comment-page-1/#comment-137600</link>
		<dc:creator>bren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.irishstu.com/stublog/?p=466#comment-137600</guid>
		<description>This made me laugh a little - for you Stu, I doubt it&#039;s necessary, as there&#039;s clearly no advertising on your site. Your opinions are clearly your own. You don&#039;t review many things, and you certainly don&#039;t hold yourself as an over-serious &quot;I Blog for the good of the nation&quot; type.
I laughed looking at the original disclosure (esp: &quot;The compensation received may influence the ... topics or posts made in this blog [and] ...may not be identified as paid or sponsored content.&quot;, which is being honest about the possibility that opinions may be dishonest as they could be paid for...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This made me laugh a little &#8211; for you Stu, I doubt it&#8217;s necessary, as there&#8217;s clearly no advertising on your site. Your opinions are clearly your own. You don&#8217;t review many things, and you certainly don&#8217;t hold yourself as an over-serious &#8220;I Blog for the good of the nation&#8221; type.<br />
I laughed looking at the original disclosure (esp: &#8220;The compensation received may influence the &#8230; topics or posts made in this blog [and] &#8230;may not be identified as paid or sponsored content.&#8221;, which is being honest about the possibility that opinions may be dishonest as they could be paid for&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

